Do you need sometimes to unsubmit (roll back analysis to assigned/unassigned review state) results which are entered-in-error by analyst?
For now, you should call “retest” action for that, but thats not what happen in real life. I would prefer add permission for staff in charge to roll back analysis status.
Is that feature worth PR?
What is the difference between the proposed feature and the currently available Retract feature?
When a result was captured with a typo, or required retesting where confidence levels are low, reagents were refreshed. or other similar reason, and it is discovered during Verification , it can be retracted and a new result captured
Does the proposed feature meet ISO requirements?
wow… how i missed that O_O